EXTRA! EXTRA! READ ALL ABOUT
IT! THE SHOCKING, LURID DETAILS OF
COPS AND HOOKERS!
THE
MEDIA FINALLY WAKES UP
TO THE 'SHOCKING
NEWS' THAT COPS
CAN AND DO HAVE
SEX WITH
'SUSPECTED
PROSTITUTES' TO
MAKE AN
ARREST!!! NOW,
WHEN WILL THE
REST OF THE
WORLD GET IT-
THAT THE PROHIBITION OF
PROSTITUTION
ALLOWS COPS TO
SEXUALLY ABUSE THOSE
WHOM THE
PROSTITUTION
ABOLITIONISTS CLAIM
ARE 'VICTIMS OF
SEX TRAFFICKING'?
BY REFUSING TO SUPPORT THE
DECRIMINALIZATION OF CONSENTING
ADULT COMMERCIAL SEX,
ABOLITIONISTS SUPPORT A
POLICY OF COPS 'RAPING
TO RESCUE' SEX WORKERS!
On March 21, 2014, a news
story broke which seems to have
shocked the normally complacent media
(when it comes to prostitution,
anyway). The New York Daily News is
just one of them: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/hawaii-five-oh-police-officers-allowed-sex-prostitutes-law-article-1.1729144#ixzz2wdOO5rCO
Cops in Hawaii claim that
they cannot make arrests of 'victims
of sex trafficking' unless they have
the opportunity to "catch them in
the act..." because sex trafficking
victims are SO wily and don't realize
they are victims! Just ask Denver
Colorado Vice
Lt. Aaron Sanchez- who says
"WE
HAVE TO HELP THEM REALIZE THEY
ARE VICTIMS!"
But
this is nothing new, it has
been happening for years- ever since
prostitution was prohibited, cops have
demanded free sex from prostitutes and
then use the law to arrest them.As the
article from 1978 or 1979 Spokane WA,
the judge said "it may violate
public morals, but personal beliefs
can't be substituted for the law..."
[HMMMMMM..... WHAT
ARE LAWS AGAINST COMMERCIAL SEX IF
NOT SOMEONE'S PERSONAL - SOCIAL OR
MORAL - BELIEFS IN
THE FIRST PLACE????]
If
authorizing cops to have
(non consensual) sex with a
'suspected victim' is a
viable way to 'help' or
'rescue' those
who are regarded as
potential victims of
sex trafficking, why not
apply this same solution to help
other 'suspected victims' of
rape, sexual assault,
pedophile priests, preachers,
teachers, coaches, and any other
crimes of a sexual nature? Surely
this is an effective way to
address suspected sex crimes where
the victim may
not realize he or
she is a victim or may be
reluctant to report being a
victim... For sex trafficking
victims, once a cop *rapes
them, then arrests them- and
threatens them with incarceration
where they are likely to be raped
by the jail staff, they may
be more willing to accept
their victimhood and participate
in the prosecution of their non
violent, non abusive clients or
employers, who are viewed by law
enforcement as 'pimps' or
'traffickers...'
*Why is it rape?
Because if the sex worker KNEW
beforehand that this person was a
law enforcement agent, do
you think the sex worker would
CONSENT to have sex with the cop?
The fact that the cop used deceit
(pretending to be a client) and
treachery (promise of agreed
upon fee ) to entice the sex
worker to provide the services of
companionship and sexual
intimacy, does not negate
the theft of services because the
money given to the sex worker is
confiscated as 'evidence' of the
sex worker's victimization' while
the services provided cannot be
returned. Some might argue that
the sex worker is committing a
crime- but if the sex worker is
the 'victim' because, according to
prostitution abolitionists,
"prostitution is like rape,' then
the cop is the criminal
perpetrating a crime twice over.
And unfortunately, cops
don't limit themselves to raping
and extorting sex workers to the
times when they are doing so
'officially'... many, many cops threaten to
arrest sex workers unless
they provide the cops with sexual
favors, or money or both. In
a number of documented cases, cops
even pimp out adult sex
workers and MINORS,
knowing that even if they are
caught, it is unlikely that they
will face the same kind of
punishment that is meted out to
non law enforcement pimps/
traffickers. Click here to
view a list of cops who rape/
extort/ pimp sex workers
Below the images is
an article I wrote about this very
issue back in 2009, for an online
'zine which unfortunately went under
before they could publish it.
[to use
clickable links on the graphics,
click on image and page will open
as a pdf]
To
view entire document from
which this is an excerpt with
all the examples of cops
raping/ extorting/ pimping sex
workers, click here:
"The Truth
About Cops, Prostitutes, Sex
Trafficking and Child Sexual
Exploitation"
|

|
Ironically,
in 1987 the court
ruled that cops can hire 'sex trafficking
victims' to have sex
with another 'suspected
criminal'- in order to
catch the more important
'criminal' (except we are
supposedly VICTIMS)! So
the cops can recruit a 'sex
trafficking victim,' (an act of
pandering for anyone not a
cop) who is
then paid by taxpayers- to
have sex for money... Thus the
taxpayers would be the
'johns' since they are
paying for being screwed. Under
the so called "Swedish Model"
in which the 'johns' are
arrested, this would mean the
cops could arrest the taxpayers
for providing the money with
which the cops hire the 'sex
trafficking victim' to be
'exploited' for the greater
good... right? It gets so
confusing when we criminalize
consenting adult activity and
yet make exceptions for law
enforcement to break the laws
they are supposed to uphold!
|
 |

UNDERCOVER
AGENTS
Written and illustrated by
Norma Jean Almodovar 2009©
Help Wanted (anywhere
USA): “Hey Guys- looking for that
perfect job? Something that will
give you access to hot babes who are
always available? You get to party
at upscale hotels, unlimited free
room service including booze AND you
get paid to get laid! Sound too good
to be true? No- I am not talking
about becoming a gigolo- this is
today’s vice cop job! But if going
through the academy and walking a
beat first before you get to the fun
part of being a cop is too much
work, there’s also the exciting
opportunity to be a high paid
undercover police informant! You get
the same great partying and getting
paid for getting laid but without
the risk of being shot at by real
bad guys before you are recruited to
work vice!
And we aren’t talking skanky street
hookers either! We got laws to round
up those ‘hos without having to say
a word! Ever priced those
Emperor’s Club gals? The ones like
billionaire former New York Governor
Eliot Spitzer hired? Think they are
out of your league? Not when you are
working for the government! We got
you covered! It’s all part of the
package! All we need is your
testimony in court that you had sex
with these poor victims and they
asked you for the money. That’s it!
Case Closed!
Not only will you have the
opportunity to get laid by the same
high caliber call girls who service
clients like Charlie Sheen and
Louisiana Republican Senator David
Vitter, but you will be doing your
community a great service by
rescuing these poor gals from a life
of exploitation and degradation
where they get paid upwards of
$5,000 an hour. After their arrest
and conviction, thanks to your
testimony, they can find societally
approved employment which is more
appropriate for them, like cleaning
toilets at Motel 6 for minimum wage!
Call your local police vice unit for
details! Get in on this exciting
career now!”
* * *
The above help wanted ad may be
fictitious but the content is not.
While sex worker rights activists like
myself have known for many years this
was happening, most people out there,
including many of the women who
advertise on the internet, don’t have
a clue that vice cops and undercover
informants can actually have sex with
a ‘suspected prostitute’ before the
cops arrest her. Not only vice cops,
but some police departments actually
hire men from the community to carry
out the ‘necessary sex act’ to make
their arrests of the prostitutes
stick. I can see you men shaking your
head in disbelief and asking yourself
how can you get a job like that?
Imagine, our tax dollars go to pay
some lucky guys to have sex with women
who are suspected of being ‘victims
of exploitation’... also known
as sex workers. You should be warned
though- if you go out there and
attempt to conduct a ‘rescue’ on your
own, you might get arrested for
solicitation and sent to your local
“John School” where you will learn how
awful you are for exploiting those
poor gals by paying them instead of
just forcing them into sex for free!
Stopping the ‘exploitation and
degradation’ of women is the
motivation behind the heavy
enforcement of prostitution
laws, according to the religious right
and radical leftist feminists who have
persuaded the mostly liberal
legislators to pass laws which give
cops cart blanche to make their
arrests. These groups of moral and
social busybodies insist that all
prostitutes are sex slaves or
‘victims’ regardless of their age or
consent. In deference to their claims,
I shall substitute their term ‘victim’
for ‘prostitute’ to show just how
ridiculous the enforcement of the laws
really is.
California doesn’t want its police
officers to be subjected to such an
unpleasant task as getting paid to
have sex with a suspected ‘victim,’
although they can if necessary, so our
liberal legislators have given them
useful tools which makes it so much
easier to rescue/arrest those
‘victims.’ See, many of those street
‘victims’ got way too smart for the
cops and found ways to circumvent the
law as it was being enforced by
undercover cops for years.
Back in the days when it was illegal
for cops to entrap suspected
‘victims,’ prostitutes/ victims would
manipulate the potential exploiter/
customer to make the first move,
because if the man was a cop, he
couldn’t initiate a sexual
encounter. The ‘victim’ would
use body language to signal if she was
interested and off they would go for a
little exploitation. So making arrests
of street ‘victims’ was a time
consuming effort and often resulted in
cops going over the line, allowing the
‘victim’ to go unrescued/ unpunished.
To remedy that embarrassment and
inconvenience, California’s Liberal
Democrats passed a law which allowed
the undercover cop to suggest an act of sex
for money and all the suspected
‘victim’ had to do to get arrested was
to “manifest an acceptance”
of the offer. If she smiled or winked
at him, that was an indication,
according to the cops, that she was
accepting the offer to be exploited
and could then be rescued/
arrested on solicitation
charges.
When the poor exploited ‘victims’
learned they could now be rescued/
arrested for just making any sort of
facial or body gesture- we called
that law the “use a smile go to
jail” law- they thought they
had outfoxed the cops again by
requesting that the potential
exploiter/ customer drop his pants and
show his genitals. Surely the cops
weren’t allowed to show their dicks,
were they? As many of those ‘victims'
discovered after the fact, the cops
could do that as well as go all the
way if necessary.
A few years of enforcing the ‘gesture’
law, California cops got really lazy
and requested the liberal legislators
give them something to make arresting
these savvy ‘victims’ almost, well,
automatic. The law which was passed
after no debate from anyone,
conservative or liberal, allowed the
police to arrest a person whom the
cops suspected of merely
possessing the intent to commit
prostitution (possessing ‘an
intent’ to be a ‘victim’????
psychic cops????? interesting
concept!) even if the suspected
‘victim’ was in a car, whether
moving or not. Heck,
if we could arrest persons who may
possess the intent to commit rapes or
robberies before they actually commit
a crime, we’d have fewer real
victims... However this concept
of arresting a person before they
commit a crime/ become a ‘victim’
hasn’t caught on outside of
prostitution, probably because we
don’t consider rapists, robbers and
spousal abusers to be ‘victims’ who
need ‘rescuing.’ Not to mention, the
ACLU and other civil libertarians
would be all over such laws, crying
fowl before the proposed bill could
get out of legislative discussion!
Even with the ability to make an
effortless arrest, cops still conduct
sting operations when they want to
arrest in volume or go after those who
run “prostitution rings.” Thus far, it
isn’t a crime to ‘possess the intent
to commit pandering,’ making it
necessary to do undercover
investigations to arrest the ‘pimps/
madams.’ Some undercover sting
operations last as long as three to
five years before any arrests are
made. During that time the vice cops
(or their paid civilian helpers) visit
the suspected den of ‘victims’ over
and over again, just to make certain
those women are actually prostitutes
and that someone else is in charge.
There have been cops who became so
enamored of the ‘victims' they were
having sex with that they left the
women huge tips. It was a rather empty
gesture, though, since it was not
coming out of their pocket but rather
the pockets of taxpayers who footed
the bill for these commercial sexual
liaisons.
Before
we go any further,
I must make you aware that it is
so potentially dangerous to rescue
(arrest) unarmed ‘victims’ that it
frequently requires the deployment
of many cops to consummate the
rescues/ arrests. The standard
ratio for cops to hookers (oops...
I meant ‘victims’) is 7 to 1, just
to ensure that the ‘victim’
clearly understands how very
seriously the government takes
their exploitation. Prostitution
is, after all, ‘worse than rape or
robbery’ for the ‘victim’ because
prostitutes are often lured into a
‘lifetime of shame and degradation
which progressively rapes their
spirit, character and self- image’...
or so the LA District Attorney
claimed when he appealed my probation
sentence for one count of pandering a
number of years ago, successfully
overturning the judge’s sentence and
forcing him to impose on me the
mandatory three to six year prison
term California law requires. If one
commits rape, robbery, assault, mayhem
and even murder, but they don’t use a
gun, they can get probation!
In Los Angeles a few years back, a
prostitution sting called “Operation
Silver Bullet” was
conducted, which was, according to the
LA Daily News “one of LAPD’s
largest prostitution stings in
several years. Vice
Detectives fanned out across the San
Fernando Valley and simultaneously
raided seven suspected prostitution
dens fronting as legitimate
businesses.” And
the LAPD proudly reported that
“approximately 100 officers took
part in Operation Silver Bullet,
netting 14 arrests... which were
all for solicitation, operating a
house of prostitution and residing
in a house of prostitution...”
Anyone who can do the math will
figure out that if it took 100
officers to bust 14 ‘suspected
victims,’ that’s 7 cops per
hooker/victim. Oh yeah, and
the cops were later given an
awards banquet to honor them for
their heroic work in making these
dangerous arrests... Makes you
wonder how they can hand out those
awards with a straight face.
When notorious Hollywood Madam Heidi
Fleiss was on trial, I had the
opportunity to sit in court every day
with my friend Sydney Biddle Barrows,
the equally notorious Mayflower Madam.
During the trial, a number of
interesting facts were disclosed, such
as how the cops set up the women and
what they did to signal their comrades
waiting in the other room that a
violation of law had taken place and
it was time to make the arrests. I
share this information with you in
hopes that you will come to realize
just how important it is to allocate
the precious and scarce police and
other government resources pursuing
these ‘victims’ and destroying their
lives, rather than pursuing real
criminals who have real victims-
victims who often do not ever see
their perpetrators punished because
the police cannot corroborate the
crime or gather sufficient evidence
against the alleged criminal to make a
case. And I guarantee you that for
these real crimes, the police do not
deploy seven officers to the scene of
the crime unless it involves a bank
robbery or homicide!
The pretend exploiter/ client/vice cop
will call the madam and claim to be a
friend of one of her real clients, and
tell her he has a bunch of buddies
coming into town. He wants to arrange
for her best girls to provide their
services for himself and his friends,
and he throws around huge numbers at
the madam to peak her interest. He
will also mention to her particular
sex acts that he wants these ‘victims’
to provide him or his buddies, which
he may also repeat to the alleged
‘victims’ over the phone prior to the
assignation. A real client generally
has a lot more class than that, so
this should be a tip off, but the
potential payday can cloud the
judgement of even the most paranoid
pimp/madam and her ‘victims.’ Another
tip off should be when the ‘client’
insists on having the madam or the
‘alleged victims’ bring along illegal
drugs for him and his friends.
To set up high class call girls and
their madam, you cannot rent a room at
the local Motel 6- so the cops work
out a deal with very upscale hotels
which agree to provide comped
luxurious suites in which to conduct
these stings, in exchange for leaving
the in- house girls alone. These would
be the ‘victims’ that the concierge
can provide the discreet hotel guest,
as long as the ‘victims’ pay off the
right hotel staff to be allowed to
work there without fear of being
‘rescued’ by the cops.
Although they are oppressed ‘victims’
who cannot think or speak for
themselves, these women are quite
capable of discerning an inappropriate
situation once they arrive in their
alleged exploiter/client’s hotel room,
and clearly if the exploiter/client
was who he said he was, there would be
expensive champagne and perhaps hors
d'oeuvres available, and we
aren’t talking chips and dip either!
To sell this undercover operation to
‘victims’ who are used to being wined
and dined at the very best restaurants
and hotels and paid upwards of $500 to
$5,000 an hour, all the accouterments
of wealth and power need to be
visible. And yes, the vice cops get to
partake of the food and alcoholic
beverages as part of their job to
deceive these wretched souls into
believing they are about to be
exploited /paid for having sex.
Quite often, the undercover cops will
request a ‘double’ - two
‘victims’ at a time. For one thing, it
speeds up the process of making the rescues/arrests but it also
provides entertainment for the other
cops who get to watch a ‘show’
of the two women kissing and fondling
each other. For while the vice cop
acting as the exploiter/client sets up
the ‘victim/s’ for her/their arrest,
in the adjoining suite, his colleagues
are videotaping everything so the jury
will see just how degrading being a
prostitute really is. May I remind you
again that it is necessary for a
multitude of vice cops to be deployed
for these ‘take downs’ as the
‘victims’ may attempt an escape, not
realizing of course that they are
better off getting arrested so they
can get on with their rehabilitation
and transition into the appropriate
careers waiting for them in the fast
food industry.
The pretend exploiter/ client (aka the
vice cop) may ask the ‘victim’ to
partially undress so he can examine
‘the goods’ before he ‘shells out the
dough.’ And to amuse the cops in
the other room, he may ask the
‘victim’ to clap, hum and do a little
dance for him in her state of semi-
nakedness, which is also the signal
that a violation has taken place and
the other cops are now to come flying
through the door with their guns drawn
to place this degraded ‘victim’ in
protective custody/make an arrest. The
‘victim’ may or may not be permitted
to put her clothes back on- but
often times she is not allowed to do
so until there is a female officer
available to do a full body cavity
search. So very often she will
be required to sit in this state of
undress in the room with the
other cops who are now waiting for the
next ‘victim’ to arrive.
Meanwhile, the farce continues until
every last ‘victim’ has been
identified and caught and the sting
has gone down successfully. Now the
‘victims’ are herded into police cars
or vans and taken to the nearest jail
facility where they will be processed.
Here again they will be strip
searched, given a de-lousing shower
and a matching set of jail house pants
and tops and put into lockup until
they can make bail. They will also be
interrogated and told that if they
cooperate with the government and
testify against their ‘pimp/madam,’
most likely they will not be put on
trial or go to jail. If they are from
out of state or another country, their
employer/ pimp/ madam will
undoubtedly be charged with
violating ‘human trafficking’ laws, a
federal offense. ‘Victims’ from other
countries will be threatened with
deportation if they refuse to
cooperate. Regardless of their
cooperation, most of these ‘victims’
will still have arrest records which
may prevent them from ever finding
other employment. At best, they
may find work earning minimum wage,
which they will have to spend paying
off legal bills and fines they may be
given for being ‘victims.’
The sting operation I have
described above is one that is
takes place within the course of an
evening, but as I said earlier, many
sting operations take place over many
months or in some cases, years. In
long term sting operations, the vice
cops or their deputized civilians
actually go through with the sex
and pay the ‘victims.’ The money is
marked, naturally, so that the cops
can detect a trail of where the money
goes after the ‘victims’ pay their
‘pimps/ madams.’ The ‘victims’ get to
spend the money anyway they please,
just as they would if the money came
from a ‘real client’ and not out of
the pocket of the taxpayers... This is
your hard earned money at
work.
One could say that these laws are
turning the taxpayers into
“johns” because they are paying
for getting screwed- while at the same
time, the cops are themselves turned
into prostitutes, because the very
definition of prostitution is getting
paid for getting laid, isn’t it? How
do we stop the exploitation of the
vice cops who are forced into
prostitution by their sergeants,
lieutenants, captains and even local
prosecutors who instruct them to have
sex with those poor alleged ‘victims’
so the ‘victims’ can be arrested?
Maybe we should stop paying the cops a
salary while they work undercover
vice, so that like the women they
arrest, they won’t be considered
‘victims’ if they have sex for free...
Same goes for those civilian males who
are paid by the cops to have sex with
‘suspected prostitutes/‘victims,’
under the law, aren’t they also
prostitutes? And wouldn’t the hiring
of them be considered ‘pandering’ just
as it is when a madam hires a
prostitute? “Pandering” in most states
is a felony and defined as
“encouraging a person to commit an act
of prostitution.” So when the average
citizen requests the continued
enforcement of these laws to ‘protect
women from being exploited,’ should we
arrest the cops or the taxpayers for
pandering? Gets rather complicated
when enforcing laws based on
subjective concepts like
‘exploitation’ and ‘degradation,’
doesn’t it?
And then there is the 1987 US 9th
Circuit Court of Appeals decision;
ruling that it is “unrealistic to
expect law enforcement officers to
ferret out criminals without the help
of unsavory characters,” (and just
why are ‘victims’ unsavory
characters?) the court
determined that it was
permissible for the government
to hire a ‘victim’/prostitute to help
them catch other criminals. This
decision made it possible for any and
every government agency to hire a
hooker/‘victim’ when necessary. This
is most likely the explanation for
Louisiana Senator David Vitter’s
hiring of DC Madam Deborah Palfrey’s
‘victims,’ and it would seem probable
that it applies to New York’s former
Governor Eliot Spitzer as well.
It gets even more complicated when
cops are encouraged to use
prostitution laws to recruit ‘victims’
and even pimps/ madams to become
informants. For many police
departments, such informants are
invaluable. In exchange for being an
informant, the ‘victims’ and pimps/
madams are allowed to practice their
profession/exploitation without fear
of being rescued/arrested. In fact, if
they don’t continue being ‘victims’ or
pimps/ madams, they would have nothing
to offer the cops by way of
information on other suspected
‘victims,’ pimps/madams and their
exploiters/ clients. But you can be
sure that the cops let these
individuals know that if they cease
being useful to the cops, they will be
rescued/ arrested and persecuted...
uh, make that prosecuted.
What I simply do not understand is how
the cops are able determine which
‘victims’ to rescue/ arrest and which
‘victims’ can be sacrificed for the
greater good, that is allowed to
continue being exploited for money?
Often it comes down to who will put
out and who won’t. The cops who
control our fate, unfortunately for us
‘victims,’ are human beings and mostly
male ones at that. They are driven by
the same biological urges that prompt
men in general to seek sexual
gratification from willing partners.
There is also the temptation of
extorting ‘victims’ for money, seeing
that a police officer’s monthly salary
is so insignificant compared to the
cash a ‘victim’ can earn within a few
hours.
There have been so many cases of cops
forcing ‘victims’ to have sex with
them in order to avoid being
‘rescued’/ arrested that it is
considered a cost of doing business by
most ‘victims.’ Occasionally the cops
get caught, such as the Long Beach,
California police officer Bryon
Ellsberry, who was charged with rape
after he continually coerced a
‘victim’/ prostitute to have sex with
him. She filed a complaint against him
and was given an opportunity to wear a
wire to record their conversation the
next time he extorted her for her
sexual favors. He was arrested and
convicted, but given a probation
sentence rather than sent to jail.
However, most states have mandatory
minimum jail sentences for those
accused of being the ‘victims’/
prostitutes... probably because there
is so much evidence to show that being
arrested and incarcerated, strip
searched and de-loused increases one’s
self- esteem, and helps ‘victims’ to
be rehabilitated and reformed- after,
of course, they give the male jail
guards a blow job or else get
sent to solitary confinement for
refusing to be cooperative...
Is there a downside to being an
undercover vice cop or a civilian
helper? Most people would think that
sexual situations with ‘victims’/
prostitutes would put those men at
increased risk for STDs. The media
portrays sex workers as being riddled
with disease- but the reality is that
a man is more likely to encounter a
diseased partner picking up a ‘one
night stand’ at a local bar- a non
commercial tryst- than he is with a
‘victim’/ prostitute.
I can understand why a man might want
to be an undercover agent- especially
men who like to brag that they “don’t
have to pay for it” even though
everybody does “pay for it” one way or
another. And as long as society looks
the other way at whatever cops have to
do to ‘stop the exploitation’ of women
and children, arbitrarily enforcing
laws against some while encouraging
others to continue breaking the law as
paid informants (the ends justify the
means), there will be guys who seek
out such work. They tell themselves
that they are helping the poor
‘victims’ escape a life of
‘degradation.’ So don’t be surprised
if someday soon you see a real help
wanted ad just like the fictitious one
in this article. But also don’t be
surprised that we ‘victims’ are
fighting back any way we legally can.
After the Heidi Fleiss’ trial I
created a poster from the information
I learned about the sting operation,
called “Top Ten Signs You
are Being Set Up by An Undercover
Cop.” It is available for free
download as a PDF from our
website: along with other
helpful posters for sex workers or
anyone else who may be interested. The
best piece of advice I have for any
woman who, when going to an unknown
client’s hotel room, is asked by the
‘client’ to get undressed, clap, hum
and do a little dance- grab your purse
and run for your life! Unfortunately
you will probably get arrested anyway,
so your only alternative would be to
ask him to get undressed, clap, hum
and do a little dance for you- the
video the cops are making from the
other room might amuse the jury enough
to acquit you of being a ‘victim!’
Here
are more of those brave, heroic cops
and civic minded men who have sex with
'victims' in order to rescue them...
click on image to view pdf with
clickable links:
|